Advanced search
Visit
11679
Last Updated: 2012/10/21
Summary of question
According to a Sunni scholar, this verse "O you who believe! Obey Allah and obey the Apostle and…" proves the invalidity of the belief in Imams. What is your opinion in this regard?
question
According to a Sunni scholar, the verse 59 of Chapter al-Nisa which says "Atte’u–llaha wa atti’u rasoola wa Ulu al-Amr-e minkum. Wa in Tanazatum fi shay....." confirms the invalidity of the concept of Imamate. Because if the Imams were infallible, then the verse should not have the phrase "Wa in Tanazatum ...". It should have been an absolute statement, "Obey Allah and the Prophet and the Ulul Amir." The phrase proves that you can have a dispute with the Ulul Amr and if you do, then refer back to Allah (SWT) and the Prophet (pbuh). Moreover, if there is a dispute and if Imamate was a valid concept, then it should have said, "Rudduhu ilal-Allah wa Rasoolehi wa ila Ulil Amr-e minkum". Please comment on this understanding of the verse.
Concise answer

The verse in question is comprised of two parts. In the first part the infallibility of those in authority can be inferred from the absoluteness of the verse about obeying God, the Prophet (s) and those who are in authority. The command is unrestricted and unconditional.  Since all necessary conditions and adverbs are mentioned in divine words and if it was likely of those in authority to make a mistake, God would certainly restrict their obedience with some conditions and He would not give an injunction without any restriction or a condition as it is in the case of obeying parents where obedience of them has been forbidden if their commands are in contrast with divine commands. Since there is no condition and adverb in this verse it is clear that those who are in authority are infallible like the Apostle (pbuh). Having said, we have to see who the manifestation of Ulul Amr (those in authority) is and  in order to get an answer to, we advise the reader to refer to question No.3057 (website:4302). To find out why "those who are in authority" is not mentioned in the rest of the verse you can refer to the following detailed answer.

Detailed Answer

The verse in question is verse 59 of chapter of al-Nisa (4) where the Quran says:"O you who believe! Obey Allah and obey the Apostle and those in authority from among you; then if you quarrel about anything, refer it to Allah and the Apostle, if you believe in Allah and the last day; this is better and very good in the end[1]."Obviously, the verse has two parts. In the first part, obedience of God, the Apostle and those who are in authority has been brought up and then there is guideline as to whom people should refer to in case of any disputes.

In the first part of the verse, God speaks of obeying Him, the Apostle and those who are in authority. Two points are important and should be noted here:

1-Absoluteness of the verse about obeying the Apostle and those who are in authority

2-Manifestation of "those who are in authority" and its compliance with twelve Imams

First point:

From the absoluteness of God's command to obey the Apostle and with no condition and adverb qualifying the statement, it can be inferred that as there is obviously no condition in God's obedience there is also no condition in obeying the Apostle and if it was least likely of the Apostle to make a mistake, God Who is Omniscient and All-Wise would not command His servants in an absolute way.

So this verse implies that the Apostle is infallible and does not command or forbid anything against God's commands otherwise it would be meaningless for God to command people to obey the Messenger in an absolute way if he were likely to make mistakes. So his obedience is exactly the same as God's obedience. Verse 8 of chapter 4 of the Quran refers to this fact where it says:" Whoever obeys the Apostle, he indeed obeys Allah[2]"

If it was least likely of the Apostle to commit a sin, God would have certainly restricted his obedience as in the case of parents where God says:"And if they contend with you that you should associate (others) with Me, of which you have no knowledge, do not obey them[3]"

The infallibility of the Apostle is proven. It is accepted by Shiites and majority of Sunnis though.

"Those in authority" is added to "the Apostle" without repeating "obey" for "those in authority" (unlike its repetition for the Apostle) which clearly indicates that what has been said about the Apostle and his infallibility is applicable to and confirmable about "those in authority". Therefore "those in authority" should be infallible and they are.

When it comes to second point i.e. the manifestation of "those who are in authority" and its application to the twelve Imams, refer to the answer of question no.3057 (site: 4302) in this regard.

Here we deal with the second part of the verse i.e. referring to God and the Apostle in quarrels and disputes:

The question here has something to do with the first part in which the infallibility of those who are in authority is substantiated and their absolute obedience has been commanded, why haven’t they (those in authority) been mentioned here and it has not been said to refer to God, the Apostle and those who are in authority and only God and the Apostle have been mentioned?

In response to this question it should be said:

First, this objection can be made to some Sunnis such as Fakhr Razi[4], Zamakhshari[5], Tabari[6] and so on since this question can be posed in every case no matter what meaning may be inferred from "those who are in authority".

Second, if "those who are in authority" are disputed over, we cannot refer to “those in authority” to settle the dispute. Therefore not mentioning or repeating "those who are in authority" in the rest of the verse does not imply their fallibility or their being unqualified to rule the Muslim nation after the demise of the Apostle.

Third, this statement is baseless to say that not mentioning "those who are in authority" in the rest of the verse means that the belief in Imams is false; by the reasons offered earlier we know that the Apostle is infallible while verse 10 of chapter 42 of the Quran says:"And in whatever thing you disagree, the judgment thereof is (in) Allah's (hand)[7]"according to the reasoning mentioned earlier should it be said that the Apostle is not infallible so he is not mentioned by God in this verse?! Or should it be said that the belief in the Apostle's prophecy –we take refuge to God – is a baseless belief while no one has said such a statement. In other words, the verse in question does not imply not to refer to Imams or to judges and so on.

Apart from all this, the issue of referring to "those who are in authority" has been brought up in verse 83 of chapter 4 of the Quran where it says:" and if they had referred it to the Apostle and to those in authority among them, those among them who can search out the knowledge of it would have known it" so referring to "those in authority[8]" is also stated in this verse.

Related index: The meaning of "those who are in authority" No.2658 (site:3057)

 


[1]Quran 4:59

[2]Quran 4:80

[3]Quran 29:8

[4]Razi, Fakhroddin Muhammad, Mafatihul Gayb, vol.10, p.144, Dar Ehyaat-Turath al-Arabi, Beirut, third edition, 1998

[5]Zamakhshari, al-Kashshaf, vol.2, p.524, DarulKitab al-Arabi, Bairut, third edition, 1985

[6]Tabari, Jami'ol Bayan fi Tafsir al-Quran, vol.5, p.180, Darul Ma'rifa, Beirut, first edition, 1990

[7]Quran 42:10

[8]Quran 4:83

 

Comments
Number of comments 0
Please enter the value
Example : Yourname@YourDomane.ext
Please enter the value
Please enter the value

Thematic Category

Random questions

  • What is the meaning of self-consciousness according to the Holy Quran?
    17982 Exegesis 2015/04/18
    According to the Quran, self-consciousness means realization of one's own self through nourishing or nurturing and reviving one's own inner and inborn talents and potentialities followed by a profound understanding of the realities of the universe and divine attributes. Self-consciousness has various degrees and it is of ...
  • Is there a problem in paying off one's debt in the evening or after dark?
    7251 Laws and Jurisprudence 2009/03/12
    Continue... ...
  • Will a husband and wife, after leaving this world, live together in paradise?
    14652 Traditional 2009/10/22
    The specific conditions and details of how we will live in the next world are not completely known to anyone except the infallibles (masoomeen). With this in mind the relationship between a husband and a wife is something that is related to this world and pious women are ...
  • What is the meaning of mutawatir and ma'roof traditions?
    10523 Contextual study 2014/10/01
    For information about the meaning of mutawatir traditions and its various types, see index "the criterion for verbal, spiritual and ambiguous mutawatir traditions", question 2412. Ma'ruf Hadith Different definitions have been presented for Ma'ruf tradition: 1. A ma'ruf tradition is one whose text and it is content ...
  • How can I repent from an illegitimate sexual relationship I had with one whom I planned to marry?
    9030 Laws and Jurisprudence 2010/11/22
    Zina or fornication (in Islamic terms, which is the subject of certain Islamic laws) means for a man’s penis to enter the vagina or anus of a woman until the glans is completely enveloped without the two being married or at least ‘similar to married’ (“similar to married” ...
  • Is it permissible to eat chips containing porcine enzymes?
    8238 Laws and Jurisprudence 2012/01/19
    The grand maraji’ responded to this inquiry like this:The office of the grand Ayatullah Khamenei:In the case of the question it isn't permissible.The office of the grand Ayatullah Makarem Shirazi:It isn’t permissible.The office of the grand Ayatullah Safi Golpaygani:If ...
  • Please let me how to get rid of masturbation?
    10527 Practical 2015/01/05
    Sin is like a foul-smelling swamp full of sewage; the more one sinks into it, the less he senses its smell, because he actually loses his sense of smell and can't tell that he is drowning anymore. At the same time, anytime one makes a strong decision ...
  • Is the story of the wedding of Hadrat Qasim in Karbala true or false?
    31431 تاريخ بزرگان 2012/10/01
    One of the concocted stories regarding the epic of Ashura is the story of the marriage of Qasim bin Al-Hasan (as), a story which has no basis and which has not been related by any authentic and reliable sources. In addition, such a thing is not rationally ...
  • Do my feet become najis when I walk on wet pavement that a dog has walked on?
    10868 Laws and Jurisprudence 2008/07/21
    If rainwater or any other water gathers in a ditch and is less than kur (there is a difference of opinion on what amount is exactly kur, and there are different ways of measuring it, according to Imam Khomeini, one way is that if ...
  • What is the Sunni opinion on Bilal al-Habashi?
    14612 تاريخ بزرگان 2008/07/02
    What Sunni references say about the great sahabi, Bilal, is that he was freed by Abu Bakr, a resistant believer against the tortures of the Kuffar, the Prophet's Mu'adhin, and one of the Mujahidin (soldiers) of Islam in different battles alongside the Prophet (pbuh). After the Prophet's demise, he ...

Popular