Advanced search
Visit
9359
Last Updated: 2008/03/04
Summary of question
What is philosophy? Why is it bad?
question
There is a hadith from Imam Hasan Askari (A.S.) which says that the scholars in the apocalyptic period turn to philosophy and Roman Sufism. I wish to know what philosophy is and why is it bad?
Concise answer

As for your question about the alleged hadith, we should say that we looked for it in our hadith collections but we did not find it.

As for the definition of philosophy, it has been defined in a number of different ways, and in one of the definitions, philosophy has been defined as a discipline that discusses being (mawjud) qua being.  Its subject deals with the essential properties of being qua being.  Its end is to achieve a general knowledge of existents and to distinguish them from that which is not really existent. When it comes to the third part of your question, we must say that the term “bad” is not commonly used in regard to philosophy.  In fact, there have been some people in the history of science who have opposed philosophy for some reasons. For instance, Al-Ghazzali has raised certain criticisms in his Tahāfut al-Falasifa (The Incoherence of the Philosophers) but Ibn Rushd (Averroes) has rejected all those criticisms in Tahāfut al- Tahāfut (The Incoherence of the Incoherence). Those who are opposed to philosophy maintain that the fundamentals and problems of philosophy stand in contrast with the religion whereas it is not the case. Great philosophers like Mulla Sadra have stated that philosophy does not contradict with religious teachings and principles. Therefore, not only we should not oppose philosophy but we should also endeavor to learn it well.

Detailed Answer

As for the first part of the question, we went through many hadith collections to find the hadith but we could not find it anywhere. It would have been better if you gave the reference for the said tradition so that we could conduct a research into it and give you a more precise answer.

When it comes to the second part of your question i.e. the definition of philosophy, we must say that philosophy has been defined in a number of different ways, and in one of the definitions, philosophy has been defined as a discipline that discusses being (mawjud) qua being. In fact, philosophy is the knowledge of the realities of things, as they are in fact, so that through knowing these realities and the objective order of the world, man may realize in himself a microcosmic rational order, which corresponds to the objective world.[1]

When it comes to the third part of your question, we must say that the term “bad” is not commonly used in regard to philosophy.  In fact, there have been some people in the history of science who have opposed philosophy. Different people have opposed philosophy with different motives. However, those of the learned, informed and unbiased scholars who have opposed philosophy, they have in reality opposed the common set of philosophical ideas some of which were not compatible with Islamic principles. Perhaps, if there is a valid narration censuring or reproofing philosophy, it is because of those incompatible ideas. When we speak of philosophy, we do not insist on all the philosophers’ views and statements being right. In fact, what we mean by philosophical attempt is the application of reason in understanding issues that can be resolved only through intellection. This endeavor has been recommended by Quranic verses as well as traditions; just like the arguments which have been produced in the Book and tradition concerning monotheism and resurrection.[2]

Now it is necessary to go through the arguments presented by the opponents of philosophy:

One of the reasons for opposing philosophy is that if philosophy could solve any problems and had any benefit, then why do philosophers disagree on a subject? In other words, the best reason for them to reproof philosophy is the discrepancy existing among the philosophers themselves causing the scholars to lose their confidence in the validity of their methods. In response to these objections, the proponents of philosophy say that discrepancies exist in every science such as those existing in mathematics. For example, if two individuals have different opinions on a mathematical issue, we cannot judge that mathematics is useless and void. As a matter of fact, these differences can motivate the expert in that branch of knowledge to further their efforts until they can reach more reliable results.[3]

Another reason for opposing philosophy is what the philosophers say is opposed to the religion. For example, al-Ghazzali is one of the opponents of philosophy. He has opposed philosophy in his book Tahāfut al-Falasifa (The Incoherence of the Philosophers) and has said that what philosophers are saying end up in many cases in kufr (infidelity). For example, the philosophical ideas relating to God’s knowledge, the eternity of the world and physical resurrection are opposed to religious beliefs.[4] But Averroes (Ibn Rushd) wrote Tahāfut al-Tahāfut (The Incoherence of the Incoherence) in response to al-Ghazzali’s objections. He has rejected al-Ghazzali’s arguments at length. He says, “If there are some differences between the religion and philosophy, they are related to the philosophical allegations of those who claim to be theosophists and philosophers whereas they have understood nothing from philosophy. If there is anyone who is well acquainted with philosophy and method of intellection, he knows very well that philosophical ideas are in no way in contrast with religion.[5]

Another reason to prove that real philosophers do not oppose the religion and religious principles is the saying of the greatest Islamic philosopher, Sadrul Muta’llehin (Mulla Sadra) who says in his book, the Four Journeys (al-Asfar al-Arba’ah):

تباً لفلسفة تكون قوانینها غیر مطابقة للكتاب و السنة

“Curse and death to any philosophy whose rules and principles are incompatible with the Book and tradition (Sunnah).” [6]

Not only have the proponents of philosophy answered the spurious arguments by the proponents but they have also explained the need for philosophy. For instance, they have said that basically true humanity depends on philosophical achievements in the sense that man’s privilege or distinction rests in his vision and tendency. Hence, if an individual suffices only to physical conceptions and does not use properly the faculty of reason, he cannot be a real human being. Philosophy consolidates the power of intellect or the faculty of reason in man.

Accordingly, a true human being is one who uses his intelligence in understanding the most important and most crucial issues to learn generally how to live a life. Basically, identifying and understanding issues that are crucial to man depend on philosophical attempts.[7]

Having said that and in view of the evidence we provided, we can conclude that philosophy is not bad and there is no reason to oppose it.

 

 


[1] - See: Mesbah Yazdi, Muhammad Taqi, Philosophical Instructions, vol.1, Bainulmelal (International) Publications, 7th edition 1387 (2009).

[2] - Philosophical Instructions, vol.1, pg. 137.

[3] - Philosophical Instructions, vol.1, pg. 135.

[4] - Ghazzali, Muhammad, Tahafut al-Falasifa (The Incoherence of Philosophers), pg. 44, Beirut.

[5] - Ibn Rushd, Faslul Maqal, p.g 26 cited from Naqd-o- Nazar (Specialized philosophy journal), 11th year, No. 1 & 2, year 1385 (2006),pg. 181.

[6] - Mulla Sadra, Al-Arba’ah, vol.8, pg. 303, Dar al-Ma’aref al-Islamiyah, 1378 A.H. Tehran.

[7] - Philosophical Instructions, vol.1 pg. 135.

 

Question translations in other languages
Comments
Number of comments 0
Please enter the value
Example : Yourname@YourDomane.ext
Please enter the value
Please enter the value

Thematic Category

Random questions

  • Who are the infallibles (ma’sum)?
    7160 Traditional 2008/08/23
    Infallibility is a spiritual power and inner virtue that restrains one from even imagining and thinking of sinning, let alone committing sin and in Islamic terms, means for one to be protected from sin, mistake and forgetfulness.Infallibility can be divided into ...
  • If the imams are essentially infallible, can we follow them as role models?
    6178 عصمت 2015/05/03
    This question emanates from incorrect notion about the concept of infallibility that considers it something mandatory and gifted by God without a cause or reason. Obviously, if we are to consider infallibility as something forced, then we would consider the infallibles as people lacking free will and ...
  • Is it possible for a human to get married with a jinn?
    6817 Laws and Jurisprudence 2009/07/19
    Thank you for your question. First of all, it should be kept in mind that knowing the answer to such questions has no effect on our lives. There is no spiritual or material benefit for knowing these things. Secondly, although it is possible for ...
  • Why is a child that has been born from a temporary marriage given to the father?
    14701 Laws and Jurisprudence 2010/09/05
    Temporary marriage is an easy and simple marriage for people that can’t practice permanent marriage, legitimized by God for a number of reasons, one of which is to prevent fornication and sexual corruption. Consequently, God has excluded a few of the rulings and conditions required in permanent marriage ...
  • What is Shirk?
    34269 Traditional 2007/01/21
    Literally, shirk means to allocate; technically, in Quranic terminology, shirk – in contrast to hanif – signifies the process of allocating someone/thing as the Almighty Allah’s partner or equal. Hanif means being inclined towards righteousness and moderation; hence, the term has been coined onto those who have disassociated themselves from ...
  • What does Islam say about life on other planets?
    22054 Exegesis 2007/02/22
                Man has always pondered the thought of whether or not there are other living organisms or intelligent life forms in other galaxies or on other planets; however a definite answer has yet to be found.
  • What is Islam’s ruling on listening to music?
    13374 Laws and Jurisprudence 2010/11/21
    Music is essentially sound, and watching it (without listening) has no ruling; the only ruling there is, has to do with producing and the sale of instruments, teaching and learning, playing, and listening to it. Most scholars consider listening to and producing lahwi music to be haram and ...
  • How was the Holy Quran compiled?
    16168 Quranic Studies 2012/04/21
    According to the history of the compilation of the Quran, the Prophet (s) himself chose the verses where to be placed. It was not the companions who arranged the verses or the number of the chapters. The Quran, which is presently in our hands and which is ...
  • Who are the Ismaeili Bahreh Shias and what do they believe in?
    7591 تاريخ بزرگان 2010/04/19
    The "Bahreh Davoodis" are a branch of the "Ismaili" sect. The "Ismailis" believe Ismail, the son of Imam Jafar Sadiq (as) which passed away during his father's lifetime, to be the seventh Imam. The followers of this sect have unique beliefs that we will explain in the detailed ...
  • What are the effects of contentment on our lives and how do we distinguish it from stinginess?
    43285 Practical 2012/05/14
    Contentment has been defined as a resting of the mind without craving something else. The word “qana’ah” which is the Arabic equivalent for contentment has been used to refer to satisfaction and happiness in an absolute and unrestricted way. As for the difference between contentment and stinginess, ...

Popular