Advanced search
Visit
8864
Last Updated: 2011/11/09
Summary of question
Did the Imams battle for power and did they want a hereditary form of government?
question
What should we say in response to those who argue that the infallible Imams (a.s.) battled for power and wanted a hereditary form of government?
Concise answer

Firstly, the seerah (biography) of the Imams shows that the Imams did not struggle for power nor did they have a craving for power. If at times they were defending their rights, it was because they believed it was their obligation to do so.

This saying of Imam Ali (a.s) "Leave me and go to others" is a good proof of the above claim.

Secondly, the hereditariness of Imamate (leadership), if accompanied with superiority to others is not a matter of objection but it is also endorsed and ratified by reason and Shari'ah. In other words, as prophethood was determined directly by God's order and He knows with whom to lay His mission, if on the basis of the same order Imamate and prophethood are decreed in a single lineage, we should accept it as was the case with Ibrahim and his two sons Ismail and Isaac who became prophets after their fathers. Similarly, after Isaac his son Jacob and then Jacob's son, Yusuf became the prophets.

Detailed Answer

There are two points to take into consideration in regard to the foregoing question:

First: If you look carefully at the lives of the Infallible Imams (a.s.), you will come to know that the Imams did not struggle for power nor did they have the desire to attain power. If at times they were defending their rights, it was because they considered it to be their obligation to do so. Go through the following two examples in this regard:

1. After the second caliph appointed six people to constitute the Council of Caliphate, Zubair gave his vote to Ali (a.s); Talha gave his vote to Utman and Sa'ad Waqas gave his to Abdur Rahman. Eventually, three people were left. If any of these people relinquished in favor of the other, he would become the caliph. However, at that time, Abdur Rahman went to Ali (a.s.) and said that he would pledge allegiance to him provided that he should act according to God's book, the Prophet's Sunnah (tradition) and Seerah of Sheikhayn (Abu Bakr and Umar). But Ali (a.s.) said that if he were to become a caliph he would act according to the Book of God and the Sunnah of His Prophet (s) in the way he understood and perceived them; thus, he rejected the caliphate because he would not act according to the Seerah of Sheikhayn. [1]

Some politicians are of the view that the Imam should have accepted apparently the three conditions and then he could have ignored them. In fact, every world and power-seeking individual might think in the said way but we see that the Imam (a.s) rejected the caliphate outright.

2. After the death of Uthman, the third caliph, the people swarmed to Ali's house. Addressing them, the Commander of the Faithful (a.s) said, "It is better for me to be your vizier and advisor rather than a ruler… leave me and go to others." [2] Does one who seeks power behave in such a way? Is it in any way compatible with any of the standards of seeking power?

We are certain that if it were not for the sake of justice, the Imams would never seek power. As the Commander of Faithful, Ali (a.s.) said, "If it were not for justice, in my view this world of yours is no better than the sneezing of a goat." [3]

Second: The hereditariness of prophethood, caliphate and government can be studied from two aspects:

1. The power is transferred from one individual to another due to family relationship without the second person being eligible for it. This kind of inheritance is not acceptable religiously nor is it reasonable.

2. Those who come to power owing to their eligibility not because of their family bonds. When it comes to such people, we should study the hereditariness of power by going through the history of the divine prophets and of the Imams thereafter.

1-2. After Ibrahim was appointed by God for Imamate, he prayed to God to let Imamate continue with his offspring and God also said that His covenant (Imamate) would not reach the unjust. [4]

2 – 2. Prophet Moses asked God to make his brother Haroon his vizier and successor. [5]

3-2. Sulayman son of Dawood inherited his father. [6]

Therefore, in all the above cases which involve inheritance, the eligibility of the individuals who replace their fathers or brothers is justifiable according to the Quran.

When it comes to Imam Ali (a.s) and the pure Imams from his offspring, there are special textual proofs from the Prophet (s) about their right to caliphate and leadership. In addition, the Prophet (s) said about Ali (a.s): "You are my heir." [7]

As for the Imamate of the Imams, it should be said that this inheritance is of the second type. The criterion for the caliphate and Imamate is a divine command. Because He knows best whom to lay His message with. [8] If on the basis of the same order Imamate and prophethood are decreed in a single lineage, we should accept it as was the case with Ibrahim and his two sons Ismail and Isaac who became prophets after their fathers. Similarly, after Isaac his son Jacob and then Jacob's son, Yusuf became prophets.

For further information, read the following indexes:

"Imamate restricted to the Offspring of the Prophet", question 9966 (site: 9955)

"The Relationship between the Establishment of the Holy Prophet (s) and Man's God-seeking Nature", question 17884 (site: 17524)

"The Imams (a.s.) and Political Leadership", question 7163 (site: 8068)

"The Underlying Reason for the Belief in Imamate and Imams", question 6421 (site: 7913).

"The Political Wilayah of Ali (a.s) at Ghadir Khum", question 2570 (site: 2742).



[1] - See: Kulayni, Usul Kaafi, Kamraei, Muhammad Baqir, vol.2, pg. 721, Uswah Publication, 3rd edition, Qom, 1996.

[2] - Allamah Majlisi, Behar al-Anwar, vol.32, pg. 7 and 8, Al-Wafa Institute, Beirut, 1404 A.H.

[3] - Nahjul-Balaghah, pg.50, Dar al-Hijrah, Qom.

[4] - Al-Baqarah: 124

 وَ إِذِ ابْتَلى‏ إِبْراهیمَ رَبُّهُ بِکَلِماتٍ فَأَتَمَّهُنَّ قالَ إِنِّی جاعِلُکَ لِلنَّاسِ إِماماً قالَ وَ مِنْ ذُرِّیَّتی‏ قالَ لا یَنالُ عَهْدِی الظَّالِمین‏.

[5] - Taha: 29 and 30. وَ اجْعَلْ لی‏ وَزیراً مِنْ أَهْلی‏ هارُونَ أَخی‏.

[6] - Al-Naml: 16, وَ وَرِثَ سُلَیْمانُ داوُد.

[7] - Sheikh Saduq, Amali, pg. 362, Islamic Library Publications, 1983. قال رسول الله ص لعلی أنت وارثی‏.

[8] - Al- An'am: 124, اللَّهُ أَعْلَمُ حَیْثُ یَجْعَلُ رِسالَتَه‏.

Question translations in other languages
Comments
Number of comments 0
Please enter the value
Example : Yourname@YourDomane.ext
Please enter the value
Please enter the value

Thematic Category

Random questions

  • Does belching out what one has eaten invalidate the fast?
    7407 Laws and Jurisprudence 2010/08/01
    If one who is fasting belches out something and it comes into the mouth, if he swallows it again, it will invalidate his fast no matter how little it is and he has to make up for it and also make kaffarah (either fast 60 ...
  • Please provide us with a short biography of Imam Ali al-Sajjad (as).
    3610 امام سجاد ع 2021/03/30
  • What are the signs for the reemergence of the Master of the Age [i.e. the Twelfth Imam]?
    10356 Modern 2011/08/10
    The topic of the signs of the re-emergence is a complicated one and calls for a thorough investigation of all the related narrations. However, in brief, the signs fall under two categories. One group consists of those signs which will certainly occur, foreshadowing the re-emergence: the rebellion ...
  • What is teyyul-ard?
    7577 Theoretical 2010/07/20
    There are different views on the true essence of teyyul-ard. One would be the theory of “اعدام و ایجاد” or “Existentiation and Elimination” of the renowned mystic, Ibn Arabi. According to this theory, the person eliminates his existence in one place and existentiates it in ...
  • What are the punishments for shaking hands with a non-Mahram, physical contact and not observing Islamic modest dress?
    20428 Laws and Jurisprudence 2011/11/21
    Different punishments and penalties have been reported, in our religious sources, for the sins mentioned in the question. We will suffice to quoting a few traditions in this regard:A) Shaking hands with a non-mahram:1. The ...
  • Why was Hazrat Muhammad (P.B.U.H.) allowed to have more than four wives?
    19591 The infallibles 2007/04/05
    The topic of the prophet of Islam’s (P.B.U.H.) marriages and number of spouses is a subject which has been questioned very much. In reference to this issue, we should mention first of all that before the ruling for the impermissibility of ...
  • Was the wife of Hazrat Abbas, Lady Lubaba, present in Karbala?
    17518 اهل بیت و یاران 2017/08/22
    1. Lubaba was the daughter of Ubaidullah bin Abbas[1] (the Prophet”s cousin) and the wife of Hazrat Abulfazl Abbas (AS). Following the event of Karbala and the martyrdom of Hazrat Abbas, she married Zaid bin Hasan[2].[3] It has ...
  • What are the legal obligations of a wife towards her husband?
    20376 Laws and Jurisprudence 2011/12/21
    The sustainability, continuity and stability of a marital life depend on love, understanding and respect for mutual rights.  In order for the family, which is small social unit, to be solidified and strengthened, the religion of Islam has made an arrangement in a way such that it has ...
  • I needed some information on the Ithna’Ashari sect in West Africa.
    7570 Modern 2008/06/17
    We apologize for the delay in responding to you. Information like that which you are looking for can only be found in specific centers, and although our researchers tried their best, they weren’t able to get the desired results for your request. At the same time, we will introduce some ...
  • Why do Muslims shake hands?
    12704 Practical 2009/03/02
    Greeting others by saying “salam” and shaking hands are all signs of sociability and good manners and conduct. The prophet of Islam (pbuh) and the imams are at the pinnacle of sociability and good behavior and our role models, therefore we must follow them in this matter.Anas ibn ...

Popular